Shopping on line can be easy, simple and save you lots of money. It can also take a lot of your time, frustrate you, and result in unwanted purchases. Now the same can be said for regular high street shopping, but with the vast opportunity presented by the Internet it will pay you to spend a few minutes reading this and understanding how to better optimize your M1 Abrams shopping experience:

1. Compare - without doubt the biggest advantage that the M1 Abrams offers shoppers today is the ability to compare thousands of M1 Abrams at a time. This is a great thing, but not necessarily all the time! Too much can be daunting at times so take advantage of the great comparison sites and where possible let them do the hard work for you.

2. Research - if it has been said it will be on the internet. Ignorance is no longer a justifiable reason for buying the wrong thing. Take the time to research in detail everything that you could possible want to know about

3. Testimonials - don't know anybody that has bought a M1 Abrams? Wrong! If the M1 Abrams is good the internet will let you know. Use the Internet as a friend and get testimonials before you buy.

4. Questions - Got a question about M1 Abrams then search the Forums, FAQ's, Blogs etc. Don't be afraid to ask .....

5. Reputation - Never heard of the company selling M1 Abrams? Don't worry, no reason why you should know every company in the world, but you know someone that does! Use the internet to find out what people are saying about M1 Abrams and build up a picture of their reputation for sales, returns, customer service, delivery etc.

6. Returns - still worried that even after all of the above your M1 Abrams wont be what you want? Check out the returns policy. There is so much competition now that someone, somewhere is bound to offer the terms that you are comfortable with.

7. Feedback - happy with your M1 Abrams then let people know, after all you are depending on others people input in your buying decision, so why not give a little back.

8. Security - check for the yellow padlock on the M1 Abrams site before you buy, and the s after http:/ /i.e. https:// = a secure site

9. Contact - got a question about M1 Abrams, or want to leave a comment then check out the sites contact page. Reputable companies have them and respond.

10. Payment - ready to pay for your M1 Abrams, then use your credit card or PayPal! Be aware of companies that don't accept them, there may be genuine reasons but given the huge amount of choice you have when buying online there is no reason at all not to buy via credit card or PayPal.

{{Infobox Weapon|name= M1 Abrams |image= ] |caption= M1A1 on a live fire exercise in Iraq, 2003 |origin= {{flagcountry|United States--> |type= [Tank classification#Main battle tank (late twentieth century) |is_vehicle=yes |service= |used_by= {{USA-->
{{EGY-->
{{KWT-->
{{SAU-->
{{AUS--> |wars= [Gulf War, [Iraq War |designer= Chrysler Defense |design_date= |manufacturer=General Dynamics Corporation |unit_cost=US$4.3 million (M1A2)Production cost of M1A2 (upgraded) from http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/lima.htm#prof www.globalsecurity.org |production_date=1979– |number= |variants= M1A1, M1A2 |weight= 61.4 [tonnes (67.7 [short tons) |length= 9.76 [metre (32.02 ft) (gun forward) |part_length= |width= 3.66 m (12 ft) |height= 2.44 m (8.0 ft) |crew= 4 (commander, gunner, loader, driver) |armour= [Chobham armour,
[Rolled homogeneous armour |primary_armament= 120 mm [Rheinmetall L44, 40 rounds |secondary_armament= 1× .50 in (12.7 mm) [M2 Browning machine gun [machine gun,
2× [M240 machine gun 7.62 mm machine guns (1 pintle, 1 coaxial) |engine= AGT-1500 multi-fuel turbine engine, Honeywell LV100-5 turbine engine |engine_power= 1500 hp (1119 kW) |transmission= Allison DDA X-1100 3B transmission |fuel_capacity= |pw_ratio= 24.5 hp/tonne |suspension= [Torsion beam suspension |clearance= |vehicle_range= 465.29 km (289 mi) With NBC system: 449.19 km (279 mi) |speed= Road: 67.72 km/h (42 mph) Off-road: 48.3 km/h (30 mph) --> The M1 Abrams is a military tank produced in the United States. The M1 is named after General Creighton Abrams, former Army Chief of Staff of the United States Army and commander of the U.S. 37th Armor Regiment.

It is a main battle tank, the well armed, heavily armored, and highly mobile offensive mainstay of modern armored ground warfare. Notable features of the M1 Abrams include the use of a powerful gas turbine engine, the adoption of sophisticated composite armor, and separate ammunition storage in a blow-out compartment for crew safety. It is one of the heaviest tanks in service.

The M1 Abrams entered U.S. service in 1980, replacing the M60 Patton and M48 Patton. It did, however, serve for over a decade alongside the improved M60A3, which had entered service in 1978. Three main versions of the M1 Abrams have been deployed, the M1, M1A1, and M1A2, incorporating improved armament, protection and electronics. These improvements, as well as periodic upgrades to older tanks have allowed this long-serving vehicle to remain in front-line service. It is the principal combat tank of the United States Army and the United States Marine Corps , and the armies of Egypt, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and as of 2007, Australia.

Background The first attempt to replace the aging M60 Patton series of tanks was the abortive MBT-70, developed with Germany. The M60 Patton was itself a gradual evolution of a design starting with the World War II M26 Pershing, with a very tall profile, and average armor and weapon compared to the contemporary Soviet designs. The MBT-70 was very ambitious, like many American weapons programs of the 1960s. It had a gun launched missile system, kneeling suspension, a driver housed in the turret, and various other ideas that ultimately proved unsuccessful. Cancellation of this project paved the way for the much more successful M1 Abrams tank, which did not incorporate most of the troublesome innovations tried by the MBT-70.

Development series, during a demonstration on the test range in 1979.

The M1 Abrams was designed by Chrysler Defense (in 1979, General Dynamics Land Systems Division purchased Chrysler Defense Division) and is currently produced by General Dynamics in Lima, Ohio, and first entered US Army service in 1980. An improved version of the M1, the M1A1, was introduced in 1985. The M1A1 has the Rheinmetall L44 120 mm smoothbore cannon developed by Rheinmetall of Germany for the Leopard 2, improved armor, and a CBRN protection system. The M1A2 is a further improvement of the M1A1 with a commander's independent thermal viewer and weapon station, position navigation equipment, digital data bus and a radio interface unit.

Further upgrades include depleted uranium armor for all variants, a system overhaul that returns all A1s to like-new condition (M1A1 AIM), a digital enhancement package for the A1 (M1A1D), a commonality program to standardize parts between the U.S. Army and the Marine Corps (M1A1HC) and an electronic upgrade for the A2 (M1A2 SEP).

During Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm and for Bosnia and Herzegovina, some M1A1s were modified with armor upgrades. The M1 can be equipped with mine plow and mine roller attachments if needed. The M1 chassis also serves as a basis for the Grizzly combat engineering vehicle and the M104 Wolverine heavy assault bridge.

Over 8,800 M1 and M1A1 tanks have been produced at a cost of $2,350,000–$4,300,000 per unit, depending on the variant.

Design features drive an M1 Abrams tank through the Taunus Mountains north of Frankfurt during Exercise Ready Crucible on February 14, 2005. Armor The Abrams is protected by Chobham armor, a further development of British "Burlington" armor. Chobham is a composite armor formed by spacing multiple layers of various alloys of steel, ceramics, plastic composites, and kevlar. It may also be fitted with reactive armor over the track skirts if needed (as in the Urban Survival Kit) and Slat armor over the rear of the tank and rear fuel cells to protect against ATGMs. Fuel and ammunition are in armored compartments with blowout panels to protect the crew from the risk of the tank's own ammunition cooking off if the tank is damaged. Protection against spalling is provided by a Kevlar liner. Beginning in 1987, M1A1 tanks received improved armor packages that incorporated depleted uranium (DU) mesh in their armor at the front of the turret and the front of the hull. Armor reinforced in this manner offers significantly increased resistance towards all types of anti-tank weaponry, but at the expense of adding considerable weight to the tank.

The first M1A1 tanks to receive this upgrade were tanks stationed in Germany, since they were the first line of defense against the Soviet Union. US tankers participating in Operation Desert Storm received an emergency program to upgrade their tanks with depleted uranium armor immediately before the onset of the campaign. M1A2 tanks uniformly incorporate depleted uranium armor, and all M1A1 tanks in active service have been upgraded to this standard as well, the armor thickness believed to be equivalent to 24 inches (610 mm) of Rolled Homogeneous Armor. The strength of the armor is estimated to be about the same as similar western, contemporary main battle tanks such as the Leopard 2. The M1A1/M1A2 can survive multiple hits from the most powerful tank munitions (including 120 mm depleted uranium APFSDS) and anti-tank missiles. In the Persian Gulf War, Abrams tanks survived multiple hits at relatively close ranges from Iraqi T-72s and ATGMs. M829A1 "Silver Bullet" APFSDS rounds from other M1A1 Abrams were unable to penetrate the front and side armor (even at close ranges) in friendly fire incidents as well as an incident in which another Abrams tried to destroy an Abrams that got stuck in mud and had to be abandoned.

In addition to the advanced armor, some Abrams, most notably M1A1s of the US Marine Corps, are equipped with a Missile Countermeasure Device that can impede the function of guidance systems of semiactive control line-of-sight (SACLOS) wire and radio guided anti-tank guided missiles (Russian AT-3, AT-4, AT-5, AT-6 and the like) and thermally and infrared guided missiles. (ATGM). This device is mounted on the turret roof in front of the Loader's hatch, and can lead some people to mistake Abrams fitted with these devices for the M1A2 version, since the Commander's Independent Thermal Viewer on the latter is mounted in the same place, though the MCD is box-shaped and fixed in place as opposed to cylindrical and rotating like the CITV.

Armament M1A1 firing in Najaf Province, Iraq during a training exercise.

Main armament M68A1 rifled gun

The main armament of the original model M1 was the M68A1 105 mm rifling tank gun firing a variety of HEAT, high explosive, white phosphorus (smoke), and a highly efficient and lethal anti-personnel (multiple flechette) round. This gun is a license-built version of the British Royal Ordnance L7 gun. While being a reliable weapon and widely used by both NATO and former Warsaw Pact nations alike, a cannon with lethality beyond the 3 kilometer range was needed to combat newer armor technologies. To attain that lethality, projectile diameter needed to be increased. The M68A1's performance in terms of accuracy and armor-piercing penetration is on par with the M256A1 up to 3000 meters out, but beyond that range the 105mm projectile lacks the kinetic energy to defeat modern armor packages.

M256 smoothbore gun

Soldier from 1st Battalion, 81st Armor Brigade, 85th Armor Division, sets the sights on the main gun of an M1A1 Abrams in Mosul, Iraq on January 8, 2005.

The main armament of the M1A1 and M1A2 is the M256A1 120 mm smoothbore gun, designed by Rheinmetall AG of Germany. The M256A1 is a variant of the Rheinmetall 120 mm Gun carried on the German Leopard 2 on all variants up to the Leopard 2A5 which replaced the L/44 barrel with a longer L/55. The newer M256A1 is manufactured under license in the United States by Watervliet Arsenal, New York.

Rounds like the M829#M829A2 were developed specifically to address the threats posed by a T-90 or T-80U tank, given their high level of protection provided the tanks by kontakt-5 Explosive Reactive Armor, and high explosive anti-tank (HEAT) shaped charge rounds such as the M830, the latest version of which (M830) incorporates a sophisticated multi-mode electronic sensing Fuse (explosives) and more fragmentation which allows it to be used effectively against both armored vehicles and personnel and low-flying aircraft. Unlike the Soviet-built tanks it was designed to go up against, the Abrams uses a manual loader rather than an automatic device, due to the belief that having a person reload the gun is faster and more reliable. This decision was proven out as the Soviet-era automatic loading system proved troublesome and even dangerous to the tank crew in some cases. Also important in the decision to use a crewmember instead of an automatic loader during the XM-1 development was the fact that autoloaders of the day did not allow for separate ammunition storage in the turret like the M1 was developed with.

The new M1028 120 mm anti-personnel Canister shot cartridge was brought into service early for use in the 2003 occupation of Iraq. It contains 1,098 3/8 inch steel ball projectiles which spread from the muzzle to produce a shotgun effect lethal out to 600 m. The steel balls can be used to clear enemy dismounts, break up hasty ambush sites in urban areas, clear defiles, stop infantry attacks and counter-attacks and support friendly infantry assaults by providing cover-by-fire. The Canister round is also a highly effective breeching round and can level cinder block walls and knock man-sized holes in reinforced concrete walls for infantry raids at distances up to 75 meters.

In addition to this, the new MRM-KE (Mid-Range-Munition Kinetic Energy) is also in development. Essentially a cannon-fired guided round, it has a range of roughly 12 km and uses a KE warhead which is rocket assisted in its final phase of flight. This is intended to be the best penetrator yet, an improvement over the US 3rd generation DU penetrator (estimated penetration 790 mm).

Secondary armament , Iraq, on February 3, 2005. Note the Transparent Armor Gun Shield installed on the loader's M240 machine gun.

The Abrams tank has three machine guns:
  • A .50 caliber (12.7 mm) M2 Browning machine gun machine gun in front of the commander's hatch. On the M1, M1IP and M1A1, this gun is on a powered mount and can be fired using a 3× magnification sight, known as the Commander's Weapon Station (CWS for short), while the vehicle is buttoned up. On the M1A2 & M1A2SEP, this gun is on a flex mount (seen at right), the Commander having to expose himself to fire the weapon manually. With the forthcoming TUSK addon kit, an M2 or an Mk 19 grenade launcher can be mounted on the CROWS remote weapons platform (similar to the Protector M151 remote weapon station used on the Stryker family of vehicles).
  • A 7.62 x 51 mm M240 machine gun in front of the loader's hatch on a skate mount.
  • A 7.62 mm M240 machine gun in a coaxial gun mount. The coaxial MG is aimed and fired with the computer fire control system used for the main gun.


    • The turret is fitted with two six-barreled smoke grenade launchers (USMC M1A1's use an eight-barreled version). These can create a thick smoke that blocks both vision and Thermography, and can also be armed with Chaff (radar countermeasure). The engine is also equipped with a smoke generator that is triggered by the driver. The Abrams also has provisions for storing an M16 rifle or M4 carbine inside the turret in case the crew is required to leave the tank under potentially hostile conditions; while the crewmen are supplied with the M9 pistol pistol as a personal sidearm.

    Aiming The Abrams is equipped with a ballistic fire-control system that uses data from a variety of sources, including the thermal or daylight Gunner's Primary Sight (GPS), all computing and displaying one of three components of the ballistic solution - lead angle, ammunition type, ans range to the target. These three components are determined using a laser rangefinder, crosswind sensor, a pendulum static cant sensor, data on the ammunition type, tank-specific boresight alignment data, ammunition temperature, air temperature, barometric pressure, a muzzle reference sensor (MRS) that determines and compensates for barrel droop at the muzzle due to gravitational pull and barrel heating due to firing or sunlight, and target speed determined by tracking rate tachometers in the Gunner's or Commander's Controls Handles allowing for target speed input into the ballistic solution. The fire-control system uses this data to compute a firing solution for the gunner. The ballistic solution generated ensures a hit percentage greater than 95 percent at nominal ranges. Either the commander or gunner can fire the main gun. Additionally, the Commander's Independent Thermal Viewer (CITV) on the M1A2 can be used to locate targets and pass them on for the gunner to engage while the commander scans for new targets. In the event of a malfunction or damage to the primary sight system, the main and coaxial weapons can be manually aimed using a telescopic scope boresighted to the main gun known as the Gunner's Auxiliary Sight (GAS). The GAS has two interchangeable crosshair; one for HEAT and MPAT (MultiPurpose AntiTank) rounds and one for APFSDS and STAFF (Smart Target-Activated Fire and Forget) ammunition. Turret traverse and main gun elevation can be accomplished with manual handles and cranks in the even of a Fire Control System or Hydraulic System failure. The commander's M2 .50 caliber machine gun on the M1 and M1A1 is aimed by a 3x magnification sight incorporated into the Commander's Weapon Station (CWS), while the M1A2 uses either the machine gun's own iron sights, or a remote aiming system such as the CROWS system when used as part of the TUSK kit. The loader's M240 machine gun is aimed either with the built-in iron sights or with a thermal scope mounted on the machine gun.

    Mobility , after being offloaded at Balad Air Base, Iraq, during Operation Iraqi Freedom.

    The M1 Abrams is powered by a 1500 hp (1119 kW) Honeywell AGT1500 (originally made by Lycoming Engines) gas turbine, and a six speed (four forward, two reverse) Allison X-1100-3B Hydro-Kinetic Automatic transmission (mechanics), giving it a governed top speed of 45 Miles per hour (72 km/h) on paved roads, and 30 mph (48 km/h) cross-country. With the engine governor removed, speeds of around 60 mph (100 km/h) are possible on an improved surface; however, damage to the drive train (especially to the tracks) and an increased risk of injuries to the crew can occur at speeds above . The tank can be fueled with diesel fuel, kerosene, any grade of motor gasoline, JP-4 jet fuel, or JP-8 jet fuel; the US Army uses JP-8 jet fuel in order to simplify logistics.

    The gas turbine propulsion system has proven quite reliable in practice and combat, but its high fuel consumption is a serious logistic issue (starting up the turbine alone consumes nearly 11 gallons of fuel). The high speed, high temperature jet blast emitted from the rear of M1 Abrams tanks makes it difficult for the infantry to proceed shadowing the tank in Urban warfare. The turbine is very quiet when compared to diesel engines of similar power output and produces a significantly different sound from a contemporary diesel tank engine, reducing the audible distance of the sound, thus earning the Abrams the nickname, "whispering death" during its first REFORGER exercise. Future US tanks may return to reciprocating engines for propulsion, as 4-stroke diesel engines have proven quite successful in other modern heavy tanks, e.g. the Leopard 2, Challenger 2 and Merkava. The small size, simplicity, power-to-weight ratio, and easy removal/replacement of the turbine powerpack does, however, present significant advantages over any proposed reciprocating replacement.

    The Abrams can be carried by the C-5 Galaxy and C-17 Globemaster III. The limited capacity (two combat-ready in a C-5, one combat-ready tank in a C-17) caused serious logistical problems when deploying the tanks for the First Gulf War, though there was enough time for 1,848 tanks to be transported by ship.

    Combat history In World War II, it took a M4 Sherman an average of 17 rounds to destroy an enemy tank 700 meters away. The Abrams, by contrast, can destroy certain enemy tanks by firing, on the move, a single round from 2,000 meters away.Rick Atkinson, Crusade p. 251, 1993. As the Abrams entered service in the 1980s, they would operate alongside M60A3 within the United States military, and with other NATO tanks in numerous Cold War exercises. These exercises usually took place in Western Europe, especially West Germany, but also in some other countries like South Korea. During such training, Abrams crews honed their skills for use against the men and equipment of the Soviet Union. However, by 1991 the USSR had collapsed and the Abrams would have its trial by fire in the Middle East.

    Operation Desert Storm move out on a mission during Operation Desert Storm. A Bradley IFV and logistics convoy can be seen in the background.

    The Abrams remained untested in combat until the Gulf War in 1991. A total of 1,848 M1A1s were deployed to Saudi Arabia. The M1A1 was superior to Iraq's Soviet Union-era T-55 and T-62 tanks, as well as Iraqi assembled Russian T-72s, and locally-produced copies (Lion of Babylon tank). The T-72s like most Soviet export designs lacked night vision systems and then-modern range finders, though they did have some night fighting tanks with older active infrared systems or floodlights — just not the latest starlight scopes and passive infrared scopes as on the Abrams. Only 23 M1A1s were taken out of service in the Gulf"According to the Army’s Office of Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations and Plans, 23 Abrams tanks were destroyed or damaged in the Persian Gulf area. Of the nine Abrams destroyed, seven were due to friendly fire, and two were intentionally destroyed to prevent capture after they became disabled. Other Abrams tanks were damaged by enemy fire, land mines, on-board fires, or to prevent capture after they became disabled." From Early performance assessment of Bradleys and Abrams, p. 24. and none of these losses resulted in crew deaths from Iraqi fire. Some others took minor combat damage, with little effect on their operational readiness. There were only 3 tank crew members wounded beyond doubt by enemy action.

    The M1A1 was capable of making kills at ranges in excess of 2500 metre. This range was crucial in combat against tanks of Soviet design in Desert Storm, as the effective range of the main gun in the Soviet/Iraqi tanks was less than 2000 meters (Iraqi tanks could not fire Anti-Tank missiles like their Russian counterparts). This meant Abrams tanks could hit Iraqi tanks before the enemy got in range - a decisive advantage in this kind of combat. In friendly fire incidents the front armor and fore side gun turret armor survived direct Kinetic energy penetrator hits from other M1A1s at the front and side armor. This was not the case for the side armor of the hull and the rear armor of the turret, as both areas were penetrated at least in two occasions by friendly Depleted uranium#Ammunition ammunition during the Battle of Norfolk.; Sketch depicting the path of a DU 120 mm round through the hull of Abrams C-12, OSD.

    Nearly all sources claim that no Abrams tank has ever been destroyed as a result of fire from an enemy tank, but some have certainly taken some damage which required extensive repair. There is at least one account, reported in the following Gulf War's :Image:DamagedByAssadBabil.gif, of an Abrams being damaged by three kinetic energy penetrator. The DOD report indicates that witnesses in the field claimed it was hit by a T-72 Asad Babil. The KE rounds were unable to fully penetrate and stuck in the armor, but because of the external damage it was sent to a maintenance depot. This is the only verified case of an M1A1 put out of action by an Iraqi MBT.

    Presumably the impacts set the storage boxes on fire. The tests at the impact point indicate the sabot shells were conventional, since no radiological trace was found there.

    Six other M1A1s were allegedly hit by 125 mm tank fire in the Gulf war official report, but the impacts were largely ineffectual.Zaloga, page 38.

    in 1991.

    On the night of February 26, 1991, four Abrams were disabled in a suspected friendly fire incident by Hellfire missiles fired from AH-64 Apache attack helicopters, with the result of some crew members Wounded in action.George Forty cites an M1A1 tank platoon leader from TF 1-37:"Speculation continues concerning what knocked out our four tanks. The three most probable answers are T-72 main gun, dismounted anti-tank missile, or Apache launched Hellfire missile. The fact that Apaches were operating to our rear and witnesses's reports of high round trajectory support the friendly fire theory. However, ballistics reports suggest that 125 mm HEAT rounds produced the damage on some of the tanks. Visual examination of others reveals one obvious sabot hole. Overall, the physical evidence implies that T-72 fire took out our tanks, but the friendly fire possibility cannot be excluded." The tanks were part of U.S. 37th Armor Regiment#1st Battalion, OSD 1998-07-29. attacking a large section of Tawakalna Iraqi Republican Guard, their numbers being B-23, C-12, D-24 and C-66. However, C-12 was definitively hit and penetrated by a friendly DU shot DoD damage statement about C-12. and there is some evidence that another Iraqi T-72 may have scored a single hit on :image:Summary.gif, besides the alleged Hellfire strike (see Lion of Babylon tank #Vs. the M1 Abrams).

    Tanks D-24 and C-66 took some casualties as wellTwo official damage assessments acknowledge casualties: D-24, C-66. Only B-23 became a permanent loss. The DoD's damage assessments state that B-23 was the only M1 with signs of a Hellfire missile found nearby.:image:Abrams-B23.jpg. Note that the M1 was hit in the rear hull, not in the turret.

    Also during Operation Desert Storm, three Abrams of the US 24th Infantry Division were left behind the enemy lines after a swift attack on Ali Air Base airfield, south of Nasiriyah, on February 27. One of them was hit by enemy fire, the two other embedded in mud. The tanks were destroyed by US forces in order to prevent any trophy-claim by the Iraqi Army."One of the M1s is hit and disabled. The crew is extracted safely and the tank left behind, not before it is destroyed by the task force commander who fires two rounds into it. The first bounces off, the second penetrates and set it on fire The terrain is still causing problems. On the attack several vehicles get embedded in mud and can't be extracted. The problem is complicated by enemy missile and machine gun fire. Two tanks and two armored personnel carriers are destroyed and discarded." - Halberstadt, Hans: Desert Storm: Ground War. Motorbooks International, 1991. p. 111.

    List of Abrams disabled or damaged in Desert Storm {| class=wikitable style="font-size: 80%;"|+! No.! Identification Number! Type of Weapon! Place & Date! Description of damage! Casualties|-|1.|Bumper B-31Halberstadt, Hans: Desert Storm:Ground War. Motorbooks International, 1991. p. 35; Atkinson, Rick: Crusade, The untold story of the Persian Gulf War. Houghton Mifflin Company, 1993. pp. 332–3; Captain Todd A. Buchs, B. Co. Commader, "Knights In the Desert." Publisher/Editor Unknown. p. 111.TF 1-5 CAV|land mine|February 19Ruqi Pocket|Tracks/Engine|None|-|2.|Unknown number One M1 tank struck a land mine in the breach and lost some road wheels. No one in the tank was injured, and the tank was back in action within a day]1st Brigade, 2nd Armored Division|land mine|February 24Southern Kuwait|Tracks|None|-|3.|Bumper K-42See :image:K-42.jpg.2nd Armored Cavalry Regiment|Struck by DPICM artillery]|-|4.|Bumper B-66http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/du_ii/du_ii_tabh.htm

    TF 1-41, 2nd Armored Division(FWD)|Three Depleted uranium Kinetic energy penetrator, after being hit by Iraqi Rocket propelled grenades|February 26Norfolk line|Penetration in the hull,below the turret|1 Killed in action,2 WIAs|-|5.|Bumper B-22TF 1-41,2nd Armored Division(FWD)|One Depleted uranium Kinetic energy penetrator|February 26Norfolk line|Front slope hitwith no internal damage|1 WIA|-|6.|Bumper A-14TF 1-41, 2nd Armored Division(FWD)|One Depleted uranium Kinetic energy penetrator|February 26Norfolk line|One hit in the left side of the hull. Extensive damage by fire|3 WIAs|-|7.|Bumper A-31TF 1-41, 2nd Armored Division(FWD)|Splinters of one Depleted uranium kinetic energy penetrator rounds, after being hit by [BGM-71 missile|February 26Norfolk line|Double penetration of the hull|3 WIAs|-|9.|Bumper D-24U.S. 37th Armor Regiment#1st Battalion|Small caliber shaped charge exhausts, compartment penetrated|2 WIAs|-|10.|Bumper B-23[U.S. 37th Armor Regiment#1st Battalion|Large caliber shaped charge, then hit by an unknown round, likely a Kinetic energy penetrator (non-Depleted uranium)|February 26Assault on Tawakalna Division|Two hits, one on the rear grills, another penetrated both sides of the hull. Catastrophic damage by fire|1 WIA|-|11.|Bumper C-12U.S. 37th Armor Regiment#1st Battalion|One Depleted uranium kinetic energy penetrator, then hit by anti-tank missile round achieved a double penetration of the hull. The [anti-tank missile set the storage area of the turret on fire]|Two small shaped charges]|February 26Assault on Tawakalna Division|Minor damage to sponson box and .50 machine-gun|1 WIA|-|14.|Bumper B-24:image:B-24-91.jpgTF 4-8th CAV, 3rd Armored Division|Enemy indirect fire|February 26Assault on Tawakalna Division|Damaged to sponson box and duffle bags|None|-|15.|Bumper C-24:image:C-24-FF.jpgTF 4-8th CAV, 3rd Armored Division|Friendly Dual-Purpose Improved Conventional Munition|February 26Assault on Tawakalna Division|Storage area shredded by shrapnelMain gun punctured|None|-|16.|Unknown number197th Brigade, 24 Infantry Division|Crippled by enemy fire, then destroyed by Depleted uranium rounds|February 27Assault on Tallil airfield|Ammunition blown-up|None|-|17.|Unknown number197th Brigade, 24 Infantry Division|Stuck in mud, then destroyed by Depleted uranium rounds|February 27Assault on Tallil airfield|Ammunition blown-up|None|-|18.|Unknown number197th Brigade, 24 Infantry Division|Stuck in mud, then destroyed by Depleted uranium rounds|February 27Assault on Tallil airfield|Ammunition blown-up|None|-|19.|Unknown numberScales, Brig. Gen. Robert H.: Certain Victory. Brassey's, 1994, p. 257.Commander tank, TF 4-64 Armor, 24 Infantry Division|Two conventional Kinetic energy penetrator or HEAT rounds from a 100 mm gun]|120 mm gun and fuel-cell punctured|None|-|20.|Unknown numberTurret number:5840U

    Hull number:D10060Table 2,:image:M1A1-A2.jpg (the M1A maintenance codename is A2).|Three conventional Kinetic energy penetrator rounds from an Lion of Babylon tank|Unknown date/location|Two partial penetrations on the rear turret right side (possible fire in the storage area). Cosmetic damage on the turret front Depleted uranium left armor plate.|None|-|21.|Bumper A-22Details on the identification of this particular tank in the talk page, by a first hand witness.2nd Platoon, A Company, TF 4-64, 24 Infantry Division|Secondary explosions from an Lion of Babylon tank"The brigade losses were one wounded, one M-2A1 Bradley damaged, and one M-1A1 Abrams lost when secondary explosion of a T-72 set sleeping bags stowed on the M-1 on fire." US Army|March 2Rumeilah Oilfields|Storage area devastated by fire.Ammunition blown-up.|1 WIA|}

    The Iraq war , pose for a photo under the "Hands of Victory" in Ceremony Square, Baghdad, Iraq.

    Further combat was seen during 2003 when US forces Iraq war and deposed the Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein. The campaign saw very similar performance from the tank with no Abrams crew member being lost to hostile fire during the battle in Iraq, mainly due to unopposed air-support. However, several tanks were destroyed due to secondary effects attributed to Iraqi 25 mm AP-DU and anti-armor Rocket propelled grenade fire - on no occasion were anti-tank guided missile or anti-tank mines encountered.

    The most lopsided achievement of the M1A2s was the destruction of seven T-72 Lion of Babylon tanks in a point-blank skirmish (less than 50 yards) near Mahmoudiyah, about south of Baghdad, with no losses for the American side (not surprisingly as a T-72 is unable to penetrate Abrams front and side).Conroy, Jason & Martz, Ron: Heavy Metal: A Tank Company's Battle To Baghdad. Potomac Books, 2005, p. 158. However, on October 29, 2003, two soldiers were killed and a third wounded when their tank was disabled by an anti-tank Land mine, which was combined with other explosives (500 kg, including several 155 mm rounds) to increase its effect. The massive explosion beneath the tank knocked off the turret. This marked the first time deaths resulted from a hostile-fire assault on the M1 tank from enemy forces. Following lessons learned in Desert Storm, the Abrams and many other US combat vehicles used in the conflict were fitted with Combat Identification Panels to reduce friendly fire incidents. These were fitted on the sides and rear of the turret, with flat panels equipped with a four-cornered 'box' image on either side of the turret front (the latter of which can be seen in the above image, similar flat panels also being employed on British Challenger 2 tanks serving in the conflict). In addition to the Abrams' already-formidable armament, some crews were also issued AT4 shoulder-fired anti-tank rockets under the assumption that they might have to engage heavy armor in tight urban areas where the main gun couldn't be brought to bear. Some Abrams were also fitted with a secondary storage bin on the back of the existing bustle rack on the rear of the turret referred to as a bustle rack extension to enable the crew to carry more supplies and personal belongings.

    During the major combat operations in Iraq, Abrams crew members were lost when one tank of the US Army's U.S. 3d Infantry Division, and United States Marine Corps troops, drove onto a bridge. The bridge failed, dropping the tank into the Euphrates, where four Marines drowned.

    M1A1 Abrams rests in front of a Fedayeen camp just outside of Jaman Al Juburi, Iraq on April 6, 2003.

    During an early attack on Baghdad, one M1A1 was disabled by a recoilless rifle round that had penetrated the rear engine housing, and punctured a hole in the right rear fuel cell, causing fuel to leak onto the hot turbine engine. After repeated attempts to extinguish the fire, the decision was made to destroy or remove any sensitive equipment. Oil and .50 caliber rounds were scattered in the interior, the ammunition doors were opened and several thermite grenades ignited inside. Another M1 then fired a HEAT round in order to ensure the destruction of the disabled tank. The tank was completely disabled but still intact. Later, an AGM-65 Maverick and two AGM-114 Hellfire missiles were fired into the tank to finish its destruction. Remarkably, the tank still appeared to be intact from the exterior.Zucchino, David: Thunder Run: The Armored Strike to Capture Baghdad. Grove Press, 2004, pp. 20-30, 73.



    On November 27, 2004 an Abrams tank was badly damaged from the detonation of an extremely powerful improvised explosive device (IED). The IED consisted of three M109A6 155 mm shells, with a total explosive weight of 34.5 kg, that detonated next to the tank. The tank's driver received lethal injuries from shrapnel. The other three crew members were able to escape.

    On December 25, 2005 another M1A2 was disabled by an explosively formed penetrator Improvised explosive device. The IED penetrated through a road wheel, and hit the fuel tank, which left the tank burning near central Baghdad. One crew member, Spc. Sergio Gudino, died in the attack.

    On June 4, 2006 two out of four soldiers of an Abrams crew died in Baghdad, when an IED detonated near their M1A2.

    Some Abrams were disabled by Iraqi infantrymen in ambushes employing short-range antitank rockets, such as the Russian RPG-7, during the 2003 invasion. Although the RPG-7 is unable to penetrate the front and sides, the rear and top are vulnerable to this weapon. Frequently the rockets were fired at the tank tracks. Another was put out of action in an incident when fuel stowed in an external rack was struck by heavy machine gun rounds. This started a fire that spread to the engine. .

    There have also been a number of Abrams crewmen killed by sniper fire during times when they were exposed through the turret hatches of their tanks. Some of these attacks were filmed by insurgents for propaganda purposes and spread via the Internet. One of these videos shows a large IED detonating beneath an Abrams and nearly flipping the vehicle, though the tank landed back on its treads and appeared to have suffered no serious damage as it was still mobile and traversing the turret following the attack.

    Variants and upgrades , 1st Marine Division (United States), breaches the obstacle belt with a mine plow during an amphibious assault in 1997.

    Specifications of variants {|class=wikitable|- align=center!! M1! M1IP! M1A1! M1A2! M1A2 SEP|- align=center! Length|colspan=5 | 32.04 ft (9.77 m)|- align=center! Width|colspan=5 | |- align=center! Height|colspan=2 align=center | 7.79 ft (2.37 m)|colspan=3 align=center | 8.0 ft (2.44 m)|- align=center! align=left | Top speed|colspan=2 | 45 mph (72 km/h)|colspan=2 | 41.5 mph (67 km/h)|align=center | 42 mph (68 km/h)|- align=center!Range| 310 mi (498 km)| | 288 mi (465 km)| 243 mi (391 km)|  |- align=center! Weight| 61.4 short tons (55.7 tonnes)]|colspan=3 | Rheinmetall L44|- align=center! Crew|colspan=5 | 4 (commander, gunner, loader, driver)|}

    Note: All of the above produce a power of 1500 hp (1119 kW).

    Tank Urban Survival Kit for M1A2

    The Tank Urban Survival Kit, or TUSK, is a series of improvements to the M1 Abrams intended to improve fighting ability in urban environments. Historically, urban and other close battlefields have been the worst place for tanks to fight—a tank's front armor is much stronger than that on the sides, top, or rear, and in an urban environment, attacks can come from any direction, and attackers can get close enough to reliably hit weak points in the tank's armor, or get sufficient elevation to hit the top armor square on.

    Armor upgrades include reactive armor on the sides of the tank and Vehicle armour#Spaced armour (similar to that on the Stryker) on the rear to protect against rocket-propelled grenades and other HEAT.

    A gun shield and a thermal sight system are added to the loader's top-mounted M240B 7.62 mm machine gun, and a Kongsberg Gruppen Protector M151 carrying a .50 caliber machine gun (again similar to that used on the Stryker) is in place of the tank commander's original .50 caliber machine gun mount, wherein the commander had to expose himself to fire the weapon manually. An exterior telephone allows supporting infantry to communicate with the tank commander.

    The TUSK system is a field-installable kit that allows tanks to be upgraded without needing to be recalled to a maintenance depot.

    While the reactive armor may not be needed in most situations in maneuver warfare, items like the rear slat armor, loader's gun shield, infantry phone (which has already seen use on Marine Corps M1A1s as early as 2003), and Kongsberg Remote Weapons Station for the .50 caliber machine gun will be added to the entire M1A2 fleet over time.

    In addition to this, a Transparent Armor Gun Shield may also be implemented as part of this kit, as it is already seeing use on some Abrams serving in Iraq.

    M1 Abrams Camouflage M1 Abrams and Yugoslav army T-55 tanks during YA withdrawal.Like all modern US combat vehicles (with the exception of the Stryker), the M1 series of Tanks come in two configurations of camouflage: an overall desert tan camouflage pattern and a three-color forest camouflage pattern used by other NATO combat vehicles consisting of brown and black on a green background. Replacement parts (roadwheels, armor skirt panels, drive sprockets, etc.) are painted overall green, which can sometimes lead to vehicles with a patchwork of green and desert tan parts. Prototype and early production M1s had the overall olive drab paint scheme of older US military vehicles from World War II through Vietnam War.

    Operators

    Taiwan has expressed interest in purchasing 50 or more M1A2 SEP Abrams tanks, and Egypt is reportedly seeking up to 125 more M1A1s in a continuation of its existing tank co-production program.

    See also

    Notes References

    External links

    {{Infobox Weapon|name= M1 Abrams |image= ] |caption= M1A1 on a live fire exercise in Iraq, 2003 |origin= {{flagcountry|United States--> |type= [Tank classification#Main battle tank (late twentieth century) |is_vehicle=yes |service= |used_by= {{USA-->
    {{EGY-->
    {{KWT-->
    {{SAU-->
    {{AUS--> |wars= [Gulf War, [Iraq War |designer= Chrysler Defense |design_date= |manufacturer=General Dynamics Corporation |unit_cost=US$4.3 million (M1A2)Production cost of M1A2 (upgraded) from http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/lima.htm#prof www.globalsecurity.org |production_date=1979– |number= |variants= M1A1, M1A2 |weight= 61.4 [tonnes (67.7 [short tons) |length= 9.76 [metre (32.02 ft) (gun forward) |part_length= |width= 3.66 m (12 ft) |height= 2.44 m (8.0 ft) |crew= 4 (commander, gunner, loader, driver) |armour= [Chobham armour,
    [Rolled homogeneous armour |primary_armament= 120 mm [Rheinmetall L44, 40 rounds |secondary_armament= 1× .50 in (12.7 mm) [M2 Browning machine gun [machine gun,
    2× [M240 machine gun 7.62 mm machine guns (1 pintle, 1 coaxial) |engine= AGT-1500 multi-fuel turbine engine, Honeywell LV100-5 turbine engine |engine_power= 1500 hp (1119 kW) |transmission= Allison DDA X-1100 3B transmission |fuel_capacity= |pw_ratio= 24.5 hp/tonne |suspension= [Torsion beam suspension |clearance= |vehicle_range= 465.29 km (289 mi) With NBC system: 449.19 km (279 mi) |speed= Road: 67.72 km/h (42 mph) Off-road: 48.3 km/h (30 mph) --> The M1 Abrams is a military tank produced in the United States. The M1 is named after General Creighton Abrams, former Army Chief of Staff of the United States Army and commander of the U.S. 37th Armor Regiment.

    It is a main battle tank, the well armed, heavily armored, and highly mobile offensive mainstay of modern armored ground warfare. Notable features of the M1 Abrams include the use of a powerful gas turbine engine, the adoption of sophisticated composite armor, and separate ammunition storage in a blow-out compartment for crew safety. It is one of the heaviest tanks in service.

    The M1 Abrams entered U.S. service in 1980, replacing the M60 Patton and M48 Patton. It did, however, serve for over a decade alongside the improved M60A3, which had entered service in 1978. Three main versions of the M1 Abrams have been deployed, the M1, M1A1, and M1A2, incorporating improved armament, protection and electronics. These improvements, as well as periodic upgrades to older tanks have allowed this long-serving vehicle to remain in front-line service. It is the principal combat tank of the United States Army and the United States Marine Corps , and the armies of Egypt, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and as of 2007, Australia.

    Background The first attempt to replace the aging M60 Patton series of tanks was the abortive MBT-70, developed with Germany. The M60 Patton was itself a gradual evolution of a design starting with the World War II M26 Pershing, with a very tall profile, and average armor and weapon compared to the contemporary Soviet designs. The MBT-70 was very ambitious, like many American weapons programs of the 1960s. It had a gun launched missile system, kneeling suspension, a driver housed in the turret, and various other ideas that ultimately proved unsuccessful. Cancellation of this project paved the way for the much more successful M1 Abrams tank, which did not incorporate most of the troublesome innovations tried by the MBT-70.

    Development series, during a demonstration on the test range in 1979.

    The M1 Abrams was designed by Chrysler Defense (in 1979, General Dynamics Land Systems Division purchased Chrysler Defense Division) and is currently produced by General Dynamics in Lima, Ohio, and first entered US Army service in 1980. An improved version of the M1, the M1A1, was introduced in 1985. The M1A1 has the Rheinmetall L44 120 mm smoothbore cannon developed by Rheinmetall of Germany for the Leopard 2, improved armor, and a CBRN protection system. The M1A2 is a further improvement of the M1A1 with a commander's independent thermal viewer and weapon station, position navigation equipment, digital data bus and a radio interface unit.

    Further upgrades include depleted uranium armor for all variants, a system overhaul that returns all A1s to like-new condition (M1A1 AIM), a digital enhancement package for the A1 (M1A1D), a commonality program to standardize parts between the U.S. Army and the Marine Corps (M1A1HC) and an electronic upgrade for the A2 (M1A2 SEP).

    During Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm and for Bosnia and Herzegovina, some M1A1s were modified with armor upgrades. The M1 can be equipped with mine plow and mine roller attachments if needed. The M1 chassis also serves as a basis for the Grizzly combat engineering vehicle and the M104 Wolverine heavy assault bridge.

    Over 8,800 M1 and M1A1 tanks have been produced at a cost of $2,350,000–$4,300,000 per unit, depending on the variant.

    Design features drive an M1 Abrams tank through the Taunus Mountains north of Frankfurt during Exercise Ready Crucible on February 14, 2005. Armor The Abrams is protected by Chobham armor, a further development of British "Burlington" armor. Chobham is a composite armor formed by spacing multiple layers of various alloys of steel, ceramics, plastic composites, and kevlar. It may also be fitted with reactive armor over the track skirts if needed (as in the Urban Survival Kit) and Slat armor over the rear of the tank and rear fuel cells to protect against ATGMs. Fuel and ammunition are in armored compartments with blowout panels to protect the crew from the risk of the tank's own ammunition cooking off if the tank is damaged. Protection against spalling is provided by a Kevlar liner. Beginning in 1987, M1A1 tanks received improved armor packages that incorporated depleted uranium (DU) mesh in their armor at the front of the turret and the front of the hull. Armor reinforced in this manner offers significantly increased resistance towards all types of anti-tank weaponry, but at the expense of adding considerable weight to the tank.

    The first M1A1 tanks to receive this upgrade were tanks stationed in Germany, since they were the first line of defense against the Soviet Union. US tankers participating in Operation Desert Storm received an emergency program to upgrade their tanks with depleted uranium armor immediately before the onset of the campaign. M1A2 tanks uniformly incorporate depleted uranium armor, and all M1A1 tanks in active service have been upgraded to this standard as well, the armor thickness believed to be equivalent to 24 inches (610 mm) of Rolled Homogeneous Armor. The strength of the armor is estimated to be about the same as similar western, contemporary main battle tanks such as the Leopard 2. The M1A1/M1A2 can survive multiple hits from the most powerful tank munitions (including 120 mm depleted uranium APFSDS) and anti-tank missiles. In the Persian Gulf War, Abrams tanks survived multiple hits at relatively close ranges from Iraqi T-72s and ATGMs. M829A1 "Silver Bullet" APFSDS rounds from other M1A1 Abrams were unable to penetrate the front and side armor (even at close ranges) in friendly fire incidents as well as an incident in which another Abrams tried to destroy an Abrams that got stuck in mud and had to be abandoned.

    In addition to the advanced armor, some Abrams, most notably M1A1s of the US Marine Corps, are equipped with a Missile Countermeasure Device that can impede the function of guidance systems of semiactive control line-of-sight (SACLOS) wire and radio guided anti-tank guided missiles (Russian AT-3, AT-4, AT-5, AT-6 and the like) and thermally and infrared guided missiles. (ATGM). This device is mounted on the turret roof in front of the Loader's hatch, and can lead some people to mistake Abrams fitted with these devices for the M1A2 version, since the Commander's Independent Thermal Viewer on the latter is mounted in the same place, though the MCD is box-shaped and fixed in place as opposed to cylindrical and rotating like the CITV.

    Armament M1A1 firing in Najaf Province, Iraq during a training exercise.

    Main armament M68A1 rifled gun

    The main armament of the original model M1 was the M68A1 105 mm rifling tank gun firing a variety of HEAT, high explosive, white phosphorus (smoke), and a highly efficient and lethal anti-personnel (multiple flechette) round. This gun is a license-built version of the British Royal Ordnance L7 gun. While being a reliable weapon and widely used by both NATO and former Warsaw Pact nations alike, a cannon with lethality beyond the 3 kilometer range was needed to combat newer armor technologies. To attain that lethality, projectile diameter needed to be increased. The M68A1's performance in terms of accuracy and armor-piercing penetration is on par with the M256A1 up to 3000 meters out, but beyond that range the 105mm projectile lacks the kinetic energy to defeat modern armor packages.

    M256 smoothbore gun

    Soldier from 1st Battalion, 81st Armor Brigade, 85th Armor Division, sets the sights on the main gun of an M1A1 Abrams in Mosul, Iraq on January 8, 2005.

    The main armament of the M1A1 and M1A2 is the M256A1 120 mm smoothbore gun, designed by Rheinmetall AG of Germany. The M256A1 is a variant of the Rheinmetall 120 mm Gun carried on the German Leopard 2 on all variants up to the Leopard 2A5 which replaced the L/44 barrel with a longer L/55. The newer M256A1 is manufactured under license in the United States by Watervliet Arsenal, New York.

    Rounds like the M829#M829A2 were developed specifically to address the threats posed by a T-90 or T-80U tank, given their high level of protection provided the tanks by kontakt-5 Explosive Reactive Armor, and high explosive anti-tank (HEAT) shaped charge rounds such as the M830, the latest version of which (M830) incorporates a sophisticated multi-mode electronic sensing Fuse (explosives) and more fragmentation which allows it to be used effectively against both armored vehicles and personnel and low-flying aircraft. Unlike the Soviet-built tanks it was designed to go up against, the Abrams uses a manual loader rather than an automatic device, due to the belief that having a person reload the gun is faster and more reliable. This decision was proven out as the Soviet-era automatic loading system proved troublesome and even dangerous to the tank crew in some cases. Also important in the decision to use a crewmember instead of an automatic loader during the XM-1 development was the fact that autoloaders of the day did not allow for separate ammunition storage in the turret like the M1 was developed with.

    The new M1028 120 mm anti-personnel Canister shot cartridge was brought into service early for use in the 2003 occupation of Iraq. It contains 1,098 3/8 inch steel ball projectiles which spread from the muzzle to produce a shotgun effect lethal out to 600 m. The steel balls can be used to clear enemy dismounts, break up hasty ambush sites in urban areas, clear defiles, stop infantry attacks and counter-attacks and support friendly infantry assaults by providing cover-by-fire. The Canister round is also a highly effective breeching round and can level cinder block walls and knock man-sized holes in reinforced concrete walls for infantry raids at distances up to 75 meters.

    In addition to this, the new MRM-KE (Mid-Range-Munition Kinetic Energy) is also in development. Essentially a cannon-fired guided round, it has a range of roughly 12 km and uses a KE warhead which is rocket assisted in its final phase of flight. This is intended to be the best penetrator yet, an improvement over the US 3rd generation DU penetrator (estimated penetration 790 mm).

    Secondary armament , Iraq, on February 3, 2005. Note the Transparent Armor Gun Shield installed on the loader's M240 machine gun.

    The Abrams tank has three machine guns:
  • A .50 caliber (12.7 mm) M2 Browning machine gun machine gun in front of the commander's hatch. On the M1, M1IP and M1A1, this gun is on a powered mount and can be fired using a 3× magnification sight, known as the Commander's Weapon Station (CWS for short), while the vehicle is buttoned up. On the M1A2 & M1A2SEP, this gun is on a flex mount (seen at right), the Commander having to expose himself to fire the weapon manually. With the forthcoming TUSK addon kit, an M2 or an Mk 19 grenade launcher can be mounted on the CROWS remote weapons platform (similar to the Protector M151 remote weapon station used on the Stryker family of vehicles).
  • A 7.62 x 51 mm M240 machine gun in front of the loader's hatch on a skate mount.
  • A 7.62 mm M240 machine gun in a coaxial gun mount. The coaxial MG is aimed and fired with the computer fire control system used for the main gun.


    • The turret is fitted with two six-barreled smoke grenade launchers (USMC M1A1's use an eight-barreled version). These can create a thick smoke that blocks both vision and Thermography, and can also be armed with Chaff (radar countermeasure). The engine is also equipped with a smoke generator that is triggered by the driver. The Abrams also has provisions for storing an M16 rifle or M4 carbine inside the turret in case the crew is required to leave the tank under potentially hostile conditions; while the crewmen are supplied with the M9 pistol pistol as a personal sidearm.

    Aiming The Abrams is equipped with a ballistic fire-control system that uses data from a variety of sources, including the thermal or daylight Gunner's Primary Sight (GPS), all computing and displaying one of three components of the ballistic solution - lead angle, ammunition type, ans range to the target. These three components are determined using a laser rangefinder, crosswind sensor, a pendulum static cant sensor, data on the ammunition type, tank-specific boresight alignment data, ammunition temperature, air temperature, barometric pressure, a muzzle reference sensor (MRS) that determines and compensates for barrel droop at the muzzle due to gravitational pull and barrel heating due to firing or sunlight, and target speed determined by tracking rate tachometers in the Gunner's or Commander's Controls Handles allowing for target speed input into the ballistic solution. The fire-control system uses this data to compute a firing solution for the gunner. The ballistic solution generated ensures a hit percentage greater than 95 percent at nominal ranges. Either the commander or gunner can fire the main gun. Additionally, the Commander's Independent Thermal Viewer (CITV) on the M1A2 can be used to locate targets and pass them on for the gunner to engage while the commander scans for new targets. In the event of a malfunction or damage to the primary sight system, the main and coaxial weapons can be manually aimed using a telescopic scope boresighted to the main gun known as the Gunner's Auxiliary Sight (GAS). The GAS has two interchangeable crosshair; one for HEAT and MPAT (MultiPurpose AntiTank) rounds and one for APFSDS and STAFF (Smart Target-Activated Fire and Forget) ammunition. Turret traverse and main gun elevation can be accomplished with manual handles and cranks in the even of a Fire Control System or Hydraulic System failure. The commander's M2 .50 caliber machine gun on the M1 and M1A1 is aimed by a 3x magnification sight incorporated into the Commander's Weapon Station (CWS), while the M1A2 uses either the machine gun's own iron sights, or a remote aiming system such as the CROWS system when used as part of the TUSK kit. The loader's M240 machine gun is aimed either with the built-in iron sights or with a thermal scope mounted on the machine gun.

    Mobility , after being offloaded at Balad Air Base, Iraq, during Operation Iraqi Freedom.

    The M1 Abrams is powered by a 1500 hp (1119 kW) Honeywell AGT1500 (originally made by Lycoming Engines) gas turbine, and a six speed (four forward, two reverse) Allison X-1100-3B Hydro-Kinetic Automatic transmission (mechanics), giving it a governed top speed of 45 Miles per hour (72 km/h) on paved roads, and 30 mph (48 km/h) cross-country. With the engine governor removed, speeds of around 60 mph (100 km/h) are possible on an improved surface; however, damage to the drive train (especially to the tracks) and an increased risk of injuries to the crew can occur at speeds above . The tank can be fueled with diesel fuel, kerosene, any grade of motor gasoline, JP-4 jet fuel, or JP-8 jet fuel; the US Army uses JP-8 jet fuel in order to simplify logistics.

    The gas turbine propulsion system has proven quite reliable in practice and combat, but its high fuel consumption is a serious logistic issue (starting up the turbine alone consumes nearly 11 gallons of fuel). The high speed, high temperature jet blast emitted from the rear of M1 Abrams tanks makes it difficult for the infantry to proceed shadowing the tank in Urban warfare. The turbine is very quiet when compared to diesel engines of similar power output and produces a significantly different sound from a contemporary diesel tank engine, reducing the audible distance of the sound, thus earning the Abrams the nickname, "whispering death" during its first REFORGER exercise. Future US tanks may return to reciprocating engines for propulsion, as 4-stroke diesel engines have proven quite successful in other modern heavy tanks, e.g. the Leopard 2, Challenger 2 and Merkava. The small size, simplicity, power-to-weight ratio, and easy removal/replacement of the turbine powerpack does, however, present significant advantages over any proposed reciprocating replacement.

    The Abrams can be carried by the C-5 Galaxy and C-17 Globemaster III. The limited capacity (two combat-ready in a C-5, one combat-ready tank in a C-17) caused serious logistical problems when deploying the tanks for the First Gulf War, though there was enough time for 1,848 tanks to be transported by ship.

    Combat history In World War II, it took a M4 Sherman an average of 17 rounds to destroy an enemy tank 700 meters away. The Abrams, by contrast, can destroy certain enemy tanks by firing, on the move, a single round from 2,000 meters away.Rick Atkinson, Crusade p. 251, 1993. As the Abrams entered service in the 1980s, they would operate alongside M60A3 within the United States military, and with other NATO tanks in numerous Cold War exercises. These exercises usually took place in Western Europe, especially West Germany, but also in some other countries like South Korea. During such training, Abrams crews honed their skills for use against the men and equipment of the Soviet Union. However, by 1991 the USSR had collapsed and the Abrams would have its trial by fire in the Middle East.

    Operation Desert Storm move out on a mission during Operation Desert Storm. A Bradley IFV and logistics convoy can be seen in the background.

    The Abrams remained untested in combat until the Gulf War in 1991. A total of 1,848 M1A1s were deployed to Saudi Arabia. The M1A1 was superior to Iraq's Soviet Union-era T-55 and T-62 tanks, as well as Iraqi assembled Russian T-72s, and locally-produced copies (Lion of Babylon tank). The T-72s like most Soviet export designs lacked night vision systems and then-modern range finders, though they did have some night fighting tanks with older active infrared systems or floodlights — just not the latest starlight scopes and passive infrared scopes as on the Abrams. Only 23 M1A1s were taken out of service in the Gulf"According to the Army’s Office of Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations and Plans, 23 Abrams tanks were destroyed or damaged in the Persian Gulf area. Of the nine Abrams destroyed, seven were due to friendly fire, and two were intentionally destroyed to prevent capture after they became disabled. Other Abrams tanks were damaged by enemy fire, land mines, on-board fires, or to prevent capture after they became disabled." From Early performance assessment of Bradleys and Abrams, p. 24. and none of these losses resulted in crew deaths from Iraqi fire. Some others took minor combat damage, with little effect on their operational readiness. There were only 3 tank crew members wounded beyond doubt by enemy action.

    The M1A1 was capable of making kills at ranges in excess of 2500 metre. This range was crucial in combat against tanks of Soviet design in Desert Storm, as the effective range of the main gun in the Soviet/Iraqi tanks was less than 2000 meters (Iraqi tanks could not fire Anti-Tank missiles like their Russian counterparts). This meant Abrams tanks could hit Iraqi tanks before the enemy got in range - a decisive advantage in this kind of combat. In friendly fire incidents the front armor and fore side gun turret armor survived direct Kinetic energy penetrator hits from other M1A1s at the front and side armor. This was not the case for the side armor of the hull and the rear armor of the turret, as both areas were penetrated at least in two occasions by friendly Depleted uranium#Ammunition ammunition during the Battle of Norfolk.; Sketch depicting the path of a DU 120 mm round through the hull of Abrams C-12, OSD.

    Nearly all sources claim that no Abrams tank has ever been destroyed as a result of fire from an enemy tank, but some have certainly taken some damage which required extensive repair. There is at least one account, reported in the following Gulf War's :Image:DamagedByAssadBabil.gif, of an Abrams being damaged by three kinetic energy penetrator. The DOD report indicates that witnesses in the field claimed it was hit by a T-72 Asad Babil. The KE rounds were unable to fully penetrate and stuck in the armor, but because of the external damage it was sent to a maintenance depot. This is the only verified case of an M1A1 put out of action by an Iraqi MBT.

    Presumably the impacts set the storage boxes on fire. The tests at the impact point indicate the sabot shells were conventional, since no radiological trace was found there.

    Six other M1A1s were allegedly hit by 125 mm tank fire in the Gulf war official report, but the impacts were largely ineffectual.Zaloga, page 38.

    in 1991.

    On the night of February 26, 1991, four Abrams were disabled in a suspected friendly fire incident by Hellfire missiles fired from AH-64 Apache attack helicopters, with the result of some crew members Wounded in action.George Forty cites an M1A1 tank platoon leader from TF 1-37:"Speculation continues concerning what knocked out our four tanks. The three most probable answers are T-72 main gun, dismounted anti-tank missile, or Apache launched Hellfire missile. The fact that Apaches were operating to our rear and witnesses's reports of high round trajectory support the friendly fire theory. However, ballistics reports suggest that 125 mm HEAT rounds produced the damage on some of the tanks. Visual examination of others reveals one obvious sabot hole. Overall, the physical evidence implies that T-72 fire took out our tanks, but the friendly fire possibility cannot be excluded." The tanks were part of U.S. 37th Armor Regiment#1st Battalion, OSD 1998-07-29. attacking a large section of Tawakalna Iraqi Republican Guard, their numbers being B-23, C-12, D-24 and C-66. However, C-12 was definitively hit and penetrated by a friendly DU shot DoD damage statement about C-12. and there is some evidence that another Iraqi T-72 may have scored a single hit on :image:Summary.gif, besides the alleged Hellfire strike (see Lion of Babylon tank #Vs. the M1 Abrams).

    Tanks D-24 and C-66 took some casualties as wellTwo official damage assessments acknowledge casualties: D-24, C-66. Only B-23 became a permanent loss. The DoD's damage assessments state that B-23 was the only M1 with signs of a Hellfire missile found nearby.:image:Abrams-B23.jpg. Note that the M1 was hit in the rear hull, not in the turret.

    Also during Operation Desert Storm, three Abrams of the US 24th Infantry Division were left behind the enemy lines after a swift attack on Ali Air Base airfield, south of Nasiriyah, on February 27. One of them was hit by enemy fire, the two other embedded in mud. The tanks were destroyed by US forces in order to prevent any trophy-claim by the Iraqi Army."One of the M1s is hit and disabled. The crew is extracted safely and the tank left behind, not before it is destroyed by the task force commander who fires two rounds into it. The first bounces off, the second penetrates and set it on fire The terrain is still causing problems. On the attack several vehicles get embedded in mud and can't be extracted. The problem is complicated by enemy missile and machine gun fire. Two tanks and two armored personnel carriers are destroyed and discarded." - Halberstadt, Hans: Desert Storm: Ground War. Motorbooks International, 1991. p. 111.

    List of Abrams disabled or damaged in Desert Storm {| class=wikitable style="font-size: 80%;"|+! No.! Identification Number! Type of Weapon! Place & Date! Description of damage! Casualties|-|1.|Bumper B-31Halberstadt, Hans: Desert Storm:Ground War. Motorbooks International, 1991. p. 35; Atkinson, Rick: Crusade, The untold story of the Persian Gulf War. Houghton Mifflin Company, 1993. pp. 332–3; Captain Todd A. Buchs, B. Co. Commader, "Knights In the Desert." Publisher/Editor Unknown. p. 111.TF 1-5 CAV|land mine|February 19Ruqi Pocket|Tracks/Engine|None|-|2.|Unknown number One M1 tank struck a land mine in the breach and lost some road wheels. No one in the tank was injured, and the tank was back in action within a day]1st Brigade, 2nd Armored Division|land mine|February 24Southern Kuwait|Tracks|None|-|3.|Bumper K-42See :image:K-42.jpg.2nd Armored Cavalry Regiment|Struck by DPICM artillery]|-|4.|Bumper B-66http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/du_ii/du_ii_tabh.htm

    TF 1-41, 2nd Armored Division(FWD)|Three Depleted uranium Kinetic energy penetrator, after being hit by Iraqi Rocket propelled grenades|February 26Norfolk line|Penetration in the hull,below the turret|1 Killed in action,2 WIAs|-|5.|Bumper B-22TF 1-41,2nd Armored Division(FWD)|One Depleted uranium Kinetic energy penetrator|February 26Norfolk line|Front slope hitwith no internal damage|1 WIA|-|6.|Bumper A-14TF 1-41, 2nd Armored Division(FWD)|One Depleted uranium Kinetic energy penetrator|February 26Norfolk line|One hit in the left side of the hull. Extensive damage by fire|3 WIAs|-|7.|Bumper A-31TF 1-41, 2nd Armored Division(FWD)|Splinters of one Depleted uranium kinetic energy penetrator rounds, after being hit by [BGM-71 missile|February 26Norfolk line|Double penetration of the hull|3 WIAs|-|9.|Bumper D-24U.S. 37th Armor Regiment#1st Battalion|Small caliber shaped charge exhausts, compartment penetrated|2 WIAs|-|10.|Bumper B-23[U.S. 37th Armor Regiment#1st Battalion|Large caliber shaped charge, then hit by an unknown round, likely a Kinetic energy penetrator (non-Depleted uranium)|February 26Assault on Tawakalna Division|Two hits, one on the rear grills, another penetrated both sides of the hull. Catastrophic damage by fire|1 WIA|-|11.|Bumper C-12U.S. 37th Armor Regiment#1st Battalion|One Depleted uranium kinetic energy penetrator, then hit by anti-tank missile round achieved a double penetration of the hull. The [anti-tank missile set the storage area of the turret on fire]|Two small shaped charges]|February 26Assault on Tawakalna Division|Minor damage to sponson box and .50 machine-gun|1 WIA|-|14.|Bumper B-24:image:B-24-91.jpgTF 4-8th CAV, 3rd Armored Division|Enemy indirect fire|February 26Assault on Tawakalna Division|Damaged to sponson box and duffle bags|None|-|15.|Bumper C-24:image:C-24-FF.jpgTF 4-8th CAV, 3rd Armored Division|Friendly Dual-Purpose Improved Conventional Munition|February 26Assault on Tawakalna Division|Storage area shredded by shrapnelMain gun punctured|None|-|16.|Unknown number197th Brigade, 24 Infantry Division|Crippled by enemy fire, then destroyed by Depleted uranium rounds|February 27Assault on Tallil airfield|Ammunition blown-up|None|-|17.|Unknown number197th Brigade, 24 Infantry Division|Stuck in mud, then destroyed by Depleted uranium rounds|February 27Assault on Tallil airfield|Ammunition blown-up|None|-|18.|Unknown number197th Brigade, 24 Infantry Division|Stuck in mud, then destroyed by Depleted uranium rounds|February 27Assault on Tallil airfield|Ammunition blown-up|None|-|19.|Unknown numberScales, Brig. Gen. Robert H.: Certain Victory. Brassey's, 1994, p. 257.Commander tank, TF 4-64 Armor, 24 Infantry Division|Two conventional Kinetic energy penetrator or HEAT rounds from a 100 mm gun]|120 mm gun and fuel-cell punctured|None|-|20.|Unknown numberTurret number:5840U

    Hull number:D10060Table 2,:image:M1A1-A2.jpg (the M1A maintenance codename is A2).|Three conventional Kinetic energy penetrator rounds from an Lion of Babylon tank|Unknown date/location|Two partial penetrations on the rear turret right side (possible fire in the storage area). Cosmetic damage on the turret front Depleted uranium left armor plate.|None|-|21.|Bumper A-22Details on the identification of this particular tank in the talk page, by a first hand witness.2nd Platoon, A Company, TF 4-64, 24 Infantry Division|Secondary explosions from an Lion of Babylon tank"The brigade losses were one wounded, one M-2A1 Bradley damaged, and one M-1A1 Abrams lost when secondary explosion of a T-72 set sleeping bags stowed on the M-1 on fire." US Army|March 2Rumeilah Oilfields|Storage area devastated by fire.Ammunition blown-up.|1 WIA|}

    The Iraq war , pose for a photo under the "Hands of Victory" in Ceremony Square, Baghdad, Iraq.

    Further combat was seen during 2003 when US forces Iraq war and deposed the Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein. The campaign saw very similar performance from the tank with no Abrams crew member being lost to hostile fire during the battle in Iraq, mainly due to unopposed air-support. However, several tanks were destroyed due to secondary effects attributed to Iraqi 25 mm AP-DU and anti-armor Rocket propelled grenade fire - on no occasion were anti-tank guided missile or anti-tank mines encountered.

    The most lopsided achievement of the M1A2s was the destruction of seven T-72 Lion of Babylon tanks in a point-blank skirmish (less than 50 yards) near Mahmoudiyah, about south of Baghdad, with no losses for the American side (not surprisingly as a T-72 is unable to penetrate Abrams front and side).Conroy, Jason & Martz, Ron: Heavy Metal: A Tank Company's Battle To Baghdad. Potomac Books, 2005, p. 158. However, on October 29, 2003, two soldiers were killed and a third wounded when their tank was disabled by an anti-tank Land mine, which was combined with other explosives (500 kg, including several 155 mm rounds) to increase its effect. The massive explosion beneath the tank knocked off the turret. This marked the first time deaths resulted from a hostile-fire assault on the M1 tank from enemy forces. Following lessons learned in Desert Storm, the Abrams and many other US combat vehicles used in the conflict were fitted with Combat Identification Panels to reduce friendly fire incidents. These were fitted on the sides and rear of the turret, with flat panels equipped with a four-cornered 'box' image on either side of the turret front (the latter of which can be seen in the above image, similar flat panels also being employed on British Challenger 2 tanks serving in the conflict). In addition to the Abrams' already-formidable armament, some crews were also issued AT4 shoulder-fired anti-tank rockets under the assumption that they might have to engage heavy armor in tight urban areas where the main gun couldn't be brought to bear. Some Abrams were also fitted with a secondary storage bin on the back of the existing bustle rack on the rear of the turret referred to as a bustle rack extension to enable the crew to carry more supplies and personal belongings.

    During the major combat operations in Iraq, Abrams crew members were lost when one tank of the US Army's U.S. 3d Infantry Division, and United States Marine Corps troops, drove onto a bridge. The bridge failed, dropping the tank into the Euphrates, where four Marines drowned.

    M1A1 Abrams rests in front of a Fedayeen camp just outside of Jaman Al Juburi, Iraq on April 6, 2003.

    During an early attack on Baghdad, one M1A1 was disabled by a recoilless rifle round that had penetrated the rear engine housing, and punctured a hole in the right rear fuel cell, causing fuel to leak onto the hot turbine engine. After repeated attempts to extinguish the fire, the decision was made to destroy or remove any sensitive equipment. Oil and .50 caliber rounds were scattered in the interior, the ammunition doors were opened and several thermite grenades ignited inside. Another M1 then fired a HEAT round in order to ensure the destruction of the disabled tank. The tank was completely disabled but still intact. Later, an AGM-65 Maverick and two AGM-114 Hellfire missiles were fired into the tank to finish its destruction. Remarkably, the tank still appeared to be intact from the exterior.Zucchino, David: Thunder Run: The Armored Strike to Capture Baghdad. Grove Press, 2004, pp. 20-30, 73.



    On November 27, 2004 an Abrams tank was badly damaged from the detonation of an extremely powerful improvised explosive device (IED). The IED consisted of three M109A6 155 mm shells, with a total explosive weight of 34.5 kg, that detonated next to the tank. The tank's driver received lethal injuries from shrapnel. The other three crew members were able to escape.

    On December 25, 2005 another M1A2 was disabled by an explosively formed penetrator Improvised explosive device. The IED penetrated through a road wheel, and hit the fuel tank, which left the tank burning near central Baghdad. One crew member, Spc. Sergio Gudino, died in the attack.

    On June 4, 2006 two out of four soldiers of an Abrams crew died in Baghdad, when an IED detonated near their M1A2.

    Some Abrams were disabled by Iraqi infantrymen in ambushes employing short-range antitank rockets, such as the Russian RPG-7, during the 2003 invasion. Although the RPG-7 is unable to penetrate the front and sides, the rear and top are vulnerable to this weapon. Frequently the rockets were fired at the tank tracks. Another was put out of action in an incident when fuel stowed in an external rack was struck by heavy machine gun rounds. This started a fire that spread to the engine. .

    There have also been a number of Abrams crewmen killed by sniper fire during times when they were exposed through the turret hatches of their tanks. Some of these attacks were filmed by insurgents for propaganda purposes and spread via the Internet. One of these videos shows a large IED detonating beneath an Abrams and nearly flipping the vehicle, though the tank landed back on its treads and appeared to have suffered no serious damage as it was still mobile and traversing the turret following the attack.

    Variants and upgrades , 1st Marine Division (United States), breaches the obstacle belt with a mine plow during an amphibious assault in 1997.

    Specifications of variants {|class=wikitable|- align=center!! M1! M1IP! M1A1! M1A2! M1A2 SEP|- align=center! Length|colspan=5 | 32.04 ft (9.77 m)|- align=center! Width|colspan=5 | |- align=center! Height|colspan=2 align=center | 7.79 ft (2.37 m)|colspan=3 align=center | 8.0 ft (2.44 m)|- align=center! align=left | Top speed|colspan=2 | 45 mph (72 km/h)|colspan=2 | 41.5 mph (67 km/h)|align=center | 42 mph (68 km/h)|- align=center!Range| 310 mi (498 km)| | 288 mi (465 km)| 243 mi (391 km)|  |- align=center! Weight| 61.4 short tons (55.7 tonnes)]|colspan=3 | Rheinmetall L44|- align=center! Crew|colspan=5 | 4 (commander, gunner, loader, driver)|}

    Note: All of the above produce a power of 1500 hp (1119 kW).

    Tank Urban Survival Kit for M1A2

    The Tank Urban Survival Kit, or TUSK, is a series of improvements to the M1 Abrams intended to improve fighting ability in urban environments. Historically, urban and other close battlefields have been the worst place for tanks to fight—a tank's front armor is much stronger than that on the sides, top, or rear, and in an urban environment, attacks can come from any direction, and attackers can get close enough to reliably hit weak points in the tank's armor, or get sufficient elevation to hit the top armor square on.

    Armor upgrades include reactive armor on the sides of the tank and Vehicle armour#Spaced armour (similar to that on the Stryker) on the rear to protect against rocket-propelled grenades and other HEAT.

    A gun shield and a thermal sight system are added to the loader's top-mounted M240B 7.62 mm machine gun, and a Kongsberg Gruppen Protector M151 carrying a .50 caliber machine gun (again similar to that used on the Stryker) is in place of the tank commander's original .50 caliber machine gun mount, wherein the commander had to expose himself to fire the weapon manually. An exterior telephone allows supporting infantry to communicate with the tank commander.

    The TUSK system is a field-installable kit that allows tanks to be upgraded without needing to be recalled to a maintenance depot.

    While the reactive armor may not be needed in most situations in maneuver warfare, items like the rear slat armor, loader's gun shield, infantry phone (which has already seen use on Marine Corps M1A1s as early as 2003), and Kongsberg Remote Weapons Station for the .50 caliber machine gun will be added to the entire M1A2 fleet over time.

    In addition to this, a Transparent Armor Gun Shield may also be implemented as part of this kit, as it is already seeing use on some Abrams serving in Iraq.

    M1 Abrams Camouflage M1 Abrams and Yugoslav army T-55 tanks during YA withdrawal.Like all modern US combat vehicles (with the exception of the Stryker), the M1 series of Tanks come in two configurations of camouflage: an overall desert tan camouflage pattern and a three-color forest camouflage pattern used by other NATO combat vehicles consisting of brown and black on a green background. Replacement parts (roadwheels, armor skirt panels, drive sprockets, etc.) are painted overall green, which can sometimes lead to vehicles with a patchwork of green and desert tan parts. Prototype and early production M1s had the overall olive drab paint scheme of older US military vehicles from World War II through Vietnam War.

    Operators

    Taiwan has expressed interest in purchasing 50 or more M1A2 SEP Abrams tanks, and Egypt is reportedly seeking up to 125 more M1A1s in a continuation of its existing tank co-production program.

    See also

    Notes References

    External links



     

    M1 Abrams



     
    Copyright © 2008 Hintcenter.com - All rights reserved.
    Home | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
    All Trademarks belong to their repective owners. Many aspects of this page are used under
    commercial commons license from Yahoo!